[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Random TC Questions- streamer current
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Random TC Questions- streamer current
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:23:40 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:23:46 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <92RNFC.A.O1.SpIPCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Random TC Questions- streamer current
> Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> "Is it really valid to assume the current in a light globe is the same
> for
> 50Hz as 100kHz? I would suspect that the "coiled coil" tungsten
> filament
> may alter this. It might be interesting to compare this to another
> method
> of current readings such as with a high speed bridge rectifier feeding a
> capacitor and a DC ammeter.
> Peter"
>
> Almost certainly, because the Q of the filament is so low that the
> reactance probably doesn't count below 1 MHz or so. There are tubes
> specifically made for power measurement which consist of two identical
> straight filaments mounted in an evacuated envelope. The power to be
> measured is fed to one filament and the current in the other adjusted
> from a separate source to give equal brightness (the eye is very
> sensitive to small brightness differences), at which point the two
> powers can be considered equal. I've used a similar method to measure
> powers at frequencies as high as 1200 MHz and the accuracy, compared to
> a VHF wattmeter, seemed to be within 10% or better.
And the inaccuracies are probably evenly divided between the lightbulb and
the wattmeter, or due to things like mismatch.