[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Litz Wire
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Litz Wire
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:27:29 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:29:24 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Nchy7C.A.6QG.MhNMCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"The point I was trying to make is that any improvement in performance
you'll make for a sparkgap coil is as good as zero. Typical TC
resonators already have Q's ranging from 150 to 300+ and most system
losses occur in the primary gap (and primary capacitors with lossy
dielectrics)."
This is a point which should be repeated periodically. Secondary Q is
not very important at all in TC matters. It can be important to build
high Q coils for radio applications, but for TC's the primarly losses
and the low secondary Q once streamers start negate the value of high Q
secondaries.
Ed