[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Terry's DRSSTC - Strike Rail
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Terry's DRSSTC - Strike Rail
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 07:30:03 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 07:31:35 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <rXumtD.A.dqD.9WGLCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
Terry,
That 1/2" split is probably to little. I have captured corona discharge
(via photos) between the ends of my strike rail with a 2 inch gap on my
DRSSTC system. I'm using about 4 inches of gap right now.
Any reason you chose to use a flat primary design as opposed to solenoid
type. You probably did mention this before, but i haven't been reading
the list too much lately.
Thanks
Dan
>Hi Dave,
>
>At 11:24 PM 3/6/2005, Terry Fritz wrote:
>>Terry, Your strike rail looks like a shorted turn. At least in your
>>picture it looks that way. I'm supprized that that would be
>okay with a
>>DRSSTC. Won't that suck up a bunch of power and mess with
>the coupling
>>to
>>the secondary?
>
>It is split with about a 1/2 inch gap in the very front
>center. There is
>plastic tubing over the ends to help support it.