[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla's CS Coil Data from ScanTesla and all....
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla's CS Coil Data from ScanTesla and all....
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:22:00 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:26:03 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <30Tn9B.A.QKE.5zHwCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
H Matt,
On 27 Jun 2005, at 11:51, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
>
> In a message dated 6/26/05 10:34:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Apart from the coupling I measured another interesting aspect of
> the design was the choice of aspect ratio for the extra coil (or at
> least some variations of it) - 1:1 for some. That ratio scores the
> highest Q for any coil I've measured and is also cited for that reason
> in other literature.
>
> Malcolm
>
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> It has been shown in several references that the theoretical
> maximum
> Inductance for a given length of wire (and hence for a given
> resistance) occurs in a helical coil when h=0.9r, which, however, is
> not a practical ratio for most coils. The 1:1 ratio would be
> consistent with having the best XL/R in a "practical " dimension coil.
>
> Matt D.
Maximum inductance <> maximum Q. This is also cited in literature and
is something I've also measured.
Malcolm