Re: ScanTesla-TRSSTC-730 - Tesla's CS coil

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Terry,
          I once built a 1:25 scale model of this machine. Amazingly
(perhaps), k between the primary and secondary was measured at around
0.6. I think I later confirmed that figure using Mark's MandK program.
Medhurst and Wheeler get you in the ballpark for the individual coils
(I ignored/didn't worry about stray primary capacitance since Cp
dominates utterly). The model actually worked and interestingly, the
system performed better with the extra coil mounted outside the pri-
sec system. I seem to remember coupling between the secondary and the
extra coil measuring somewhere around 0.06 with the coils mounted
coaxially.

Malcolm


On 23 Jun 2005, at 19:11, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> With Antonio's brand new TRSSTC engine, we can do Tesla's Colorado
> Springs coil now!!! ;-))
>
> However, I don't have Richard Hull's analysis of that coil, and I have
> no idea what the numbers are.  If anyone would happen to know any of
> the following it would sure help?
>
> * Cprimary =
> * Rprimary =
> * Lprimary =
> * Lsecondary =
> * Coupling =
> * Rsecondary =
> * Csecondary =
> * Ltertiary =
> * Rtertiary =
> * Ctertiary =
> * VCprimary Initial Value =
> * BPS =
> * Coil Power Limit (watts) =
>
>
>
>
> This program simulates the structure:
>      +v1-      k12         -i3+
>   +---C1--R1--+   +--R2--+--L3--R3--+--R4--+
> +|         + |   | +    |  +       |  +   |  +
> vin       i1 L1 L2 i2   C2 v2      C3 v3  C4 v4
> -|         - |   | -    |  -       |  -   |  -
>   +-----------+   +------+----------+------+
>
>
> Courier font ;-)
>
>
>
> I can guess at things like the resistances.  But if anyone happens to
> have a nice list of any of this handy...
>
> Cheers,
>
>          Terry
>          teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> >Hi Mike,
> >
> >Tesla should have made it a DRSSTC :o))))
> >
> >The program only does a conventional two coil system at the moment
> >and Tesla's coil was a three coil magnifier type system.  "I" am not
> >sure even what model to use there, but Antonio has worked much in the
> >three coil area...
> >
> >If the Antonio Engine were modified for a three coil system, adding
> >the extra elements to the rest of the program would be very easy.
> >One may be able to simply make the extra elements null values so the
> >two coil case could still run under the same program...  It would
> >really be very easy to implement once the base model is known...
> >
> >Of course, the real challenge first was just to get "any program" to
> >"work".  Now we seem to have gotten there and can think about where
> >to go next.  The streamer dynamic load model seems to get a lot of
> >attention too...
> >
> >I think we should slow down a little and let folks catchup and play
> >with the program and see where they want it to go next.  I have spent
> >all week working on it and I know there are folks trying to catch up,
> >so I wish to give them a chance, and for me to "rest" (I never really
> >rest  ;-))
> >
> >It is probably best not to go drastically changing the program at
> >this point unless a little bug pops up...  Keeping the program in one
> >place allows others to come up to speed without trying to hit a
> >moving target...  I want to spend time now "playing" with the program
> >rather than changing it :-))  Like Steve Conner, I also have to "fix"
> >my DRSSTC to be as good as Steve Ward's >:o)))   Scan Tesla shows us
> >some pretty obvious improvements that need to be made!!!
> >
> >I ponder the contour plots...  The DRSSTC seems to be so much better
> >in every way......  What do all the surfaces mean....
> >
> >BTW - The www.drsstc.com server and the www.hot-streamer.com server
> >have their bandwidth now ;-))  I can also answer question off-list if
> >anyone has any about the program.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >         Terry
> >teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >At 06:12 PM 6/21/2005, you wrote:
> >>Hi Terry,
> >>               Now that you have the cool program running to play
> >>               "what
> >> if" on the coil data, I really do wonder how it thinks it would
> >> improve on Tesla's CS coil that was duplicated as close as could be
> >> (the 51 feet diameter one). As you have a lot of data on that coil,
> >> could you run this beast through the computer and see what it would
> >> have done different? (well, besides being a DRSSTC to begin with).
> >>Mike
> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:21 PM Subject:
> >>Re: ScanTesla700 - Now were playing with power :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>>Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>