[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Freau number...
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The Freau number...
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:17:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:23:36 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <3jSozC.A.VfC.kDmtCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 19 Jun 2005, at 21:30, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: FIFTYGUY@xxxxxxx
>
> In a message dated 6/19/05 6:26:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> BTW - Bill Lemieux says that commercial Tesla coils made in Boulder
> (~5400 feet above sea level) perform remarkably BETTER at LOWER
> altitudes!! There was a problem that they would arc much further than
> expected when delivered to sea level customers...
>
> Just throwing out a guess-
>
> These commercial coils are disruptive coils? Perhaps the spark
> gaps
> quench better in the denser air, offsetting any gain that the thinner
> air might have afforded the secondary streamers themselves?
> If so, good thing it's a lot easier to pressurize a spark gap
> than to
> de-pressurize an entire coil...
>
> -Phil LaBudde
For a given coil I think breakout would require a higher voltage and
hence higher toroid energy at sea level also. Y-N?
Malcolm