[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Streamer V/I evolution
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Streamer V/I evolution
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:05:07 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:14:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <bu5X8.A.I_C.XY-3CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Terry,
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 7/21/2005 12:05 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Streamer V/I evolution
Original poster: Terry Fritz teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am wondering if the scope is too low of bandwidth for the current
>monitor. Instead of picking up fast high current peaks the low
>bandwidth is tuning the pulse into a slower lower current peak.
I'll measure some single bang discharge at a higher sample rate to check that.
>It is possible the arc is just getting noise into my stuff somewhere
>too and the currents are not that high at all? Yours is far better
>shielded than mine.
Well, of course you would be better off using more copper (band, not
wire or sock) to ground your scope and your coax on both ends.
Best Regards