[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Streamer V/I evolution - Topics Moderator note
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Streamer V/I evolution - Topics Moderator note
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:21:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:21:02 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <CU5saB.A.qBB.dxt3CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Again,
I will try to play with this too. My top voltage is monitored
remotely, unlike your "dream system", so I really don't have numbers
there but the waveforms should "look" right. My tiny sparks are also little...
Cheers,
Terry
I have the plain wave antenna for the top voltage (no calibration)
and a Pearson 110 current monitor on the ground rod like this:
http://hot-streamer.com/temp/DaveTest-57.jpg
I set the scope for 50 ohms input impedance so that bandwidth should
be pretty good to 20MHz. The spark gap was about 10cm.
Here is a typical higher speed scope capture I got:
http://hot-streamer.com/temp/Marco-001.gif
The scope is 100MHz. The yellow is the top voltage from the plane
wave antenna (not in a real good position sitting on a trash can
under the table...) and the blue is the current from the Pearson. It
looks like the big spark takes place in about 50nS! The raw
numerical data file is here:
http://hot-streamer.com/temp/Marco-002.CSV
Cheers,
Terry