[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps - any difference?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps - any difference?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:30:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:30:29 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <tiD7qD.A.CdC.D3V1CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: boris petkovic <petkovic7@xxxxxxxxx>
> Length ~ SQRT(bang energy)
>
> The 20 Joule system should have arcs SQRT(20/4) =
> 2.236 times longer.
> The higher BPS only seems to make them brighter and
> more powerful but not
> longer.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
-----
I would say the relation Lenght::SQRT(bang energy) is
more suitable for a single shot discharge test on a
given coil.IOW,in this case Lenght~Vout is a strong
depedence in a typical TC output potentials ballpark.
But these devices develop sparks by the virtue of
subsequent bangs owing to remanent channel ionisation
and,to some extent,space charge debris.
Hence the complications.
For a fixed power input on a tested coil ,the
relation may turn to be weakly correlated with
experiments in 120...240 BPS range,while being
reasonably well correlated in 500...1000 BPS range.
I guess some OLTC experimenters will be probing their
systems as regards these matters.
I think J.Freau did some tests on his spark gap coil
in the past , and made comparations between 120 BPS
and 240 BPS mode,so he may wish to comment more about
it.
Cheers,
Boris
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs