[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Racing sparks vs. primary design
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Racing sparks vs. primary design
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:54:06 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:54:11 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <2Br69B.A.vlE.DFd0CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 9 Jul 2005, at 13:59, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi all
>
> The discussion between John Freau and Jim Mora got me thinking.
>
> I have been wondering for a while whether the voltage profile on the
> secondary is determined by the shape of the primary. I think a little
> solenoid primary that hugs the bottom of the secondary will induce
> most voltage in the bottom of the secondary. Because of its small
> size, the field is very intense near to the primary coil and dies away
> quickly with distance, so it will roast the bottom of the secondary
> while hardly touching the top.
>
> Hence I expect it will give racing sparks sooner than a large diameter
> solenoid, cone, or pancake that "throws" the field further up and
> spreads it more evenly over the secondary. Even if both primaries had
> the same overall coupling coefficient.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> Steve Conner
It would be really interesting to see the primary field mapped onto
the secondary for differentcoil types and geometries. K only gives
the degree of coupling, not which portion is being coupled into most
although k=1 speaks for itself. Graphical modellers?
Malcolm