[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DRSSTC design and improvements
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: DRSSTC design and improvements
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:16:24 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:17:50 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <gUhFYD.A.7sF.8qo8BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "colin heath" <colin.heath4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
well im onto my third drsstc build. the first disaster the second
wasnt bad giving around 21" with half bridge of the 1n40n60 igbt's. well i
ran this with 100nf tank cap and a 12" helical primary tapped at 5 turns.
after reading steve wards post im wondering whether to change my design a
bit. i was currently planning to use 100nf again running the 200khz
secondary i have. im now thinking that i should be looking at perhaps going
to a much larger tank cap and less primary inductance to drop the impedance
and go with a shorter on time. i too was running 300uS on time on previous
coils.
so in designing the coil should we aim for 100uS on time then leave it
there and work on things reducing primary losses and larger tank cap rather
than upping the on time?
cheers
colin heath