[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electronic PWM variac
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: electronic PWM variac
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:48:22 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:54:59 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9FO_gD.A.44.5x3BDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Brady Hauth <bhauth@xxxxxxxxx>
Alright, any thinking about light ballasts is way off. What you would
use for a pole pig coil is an IGBT, and those are quite reasonable per
watt. <http://www.mpja.com/productview.asp?product=15539+QT> is 800
watts/$ at 120v. There's your solution, really. The small inductance
of the pole pig should limit current at a high enough frequency.
Putting in a small capacitor across the pole pig will prevent heat
buildup in the IGBT.
In terms of what you can then do - With IGBTs and a pole pig, you have
a flyback! Also, if you have a continuous arc, you can use that as an
audio transducer. (the limiting PWM would be an ultrasonic tone above
the audio input)
> The "buck a watt" figure is way high.
> They're very cheap and used in all of the screw-in fluorescents intended
> to replace incandescents. Those retail for about 5 bucks.
I believe those cheap ones use magnetic ballast, and the 5 buck ones
are about 15 watts. It does depend on how mass produced they are - you
were talking about 100 pounds of MOT, which is bigger than
<http://www.adorama.com/AR560806.html>. Nevertheless, my figure was
high.
> This is a
> case where I suspect cost is almost independent of power output.
That would make little sense. The semiconductor cost is proportional
to about the max voltage * the max current, just like, in this case,
the max power is. If you have a circuit where this isn't the case, I
know some coilgun guys that would like to see it.