[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electronic PWM variac
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: electronic PWM variac
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:58:30 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:59:23 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <o-tqxC.A.XAD.IwiBDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> >Re "electronic variac" using a bridge rectifier and a
>> > single PWM FET.
>>
>>>If this circuit works with inductive loads, then it's
>>>only by sheer luck. There is no path for the current
>>>to free-wheel when the FET is off, so you wind up
>>>either destroying it, or having to use an oversized
>>>snubber that wastes a lot of power to keep it alive...
>>>
>>>Steve Conner
> Ah yes... but a TC with a pole pig isn't particularly inductive. At
> least, it shouldn't be.. the pole pig has fairly low leakage
> inductance. There's not much energy stored in the capacitor charging
> part of the primary, so freewheeling might not be much of an issue.
> Driving an unloaded NST is another matter.
how about magnetizing inductance of the pig?
and how about pfc-ed nst?