[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electronic PWM variac
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: electronic PWM variac
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:40:08 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:48:58 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <DsKd5B.A.VIH.YgNBDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> A few months back, someone mentioned that they had
> built an
> "electronic variac" using a bridge rectifier and a
> single PWM FET.
If this circuit works with inductive loads, then it's
only by sheer luck. There is no path for the current
to free-wheel when the FET is off, so you wind up
either destroying it, or having to use an oversized
snubber that wastes a lot of power to keep it alive.
It's better to use four FETs and make a synchronous
buck converter with bidirectional switches.
> A 555 can swing the
> voltage to turn
> most FETs on, but does it have the drive capability,
> and the 0-100%
> duty cycle you'd want?
The drive capability is a few hundred milliamps,
enough for small FETs. You can get 0-100% duty cycle
using the circuit with steering diodes. (See "Nomad's
555 Circuit" on the link below.)
http://www.cpemma.co.uk/pwm.html
> Has anyone tried to turn one of these into an
> "electronic ballast"
> that synthesizes the effect of series inductance
> into a SG coil?
I started down this road. But I soon realised that the
electronic ballast will never behave the same as an
iron one because it has nowhere to store energy.
Steve Conner