[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NST Pulse Voltage
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: NST Pulse Voltage
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:36:58 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:41:52 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <On1KPC.A.GeD.fsCADB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"It *is* possible to run the NST at a higher frequency, thus allowing
more Volts for less seconds (the V*t product is per half-cycle of
operation, and assuming the core resets before the next cycle). So
running at 120hz rather than 60hz will let you put in 500V for 20kv
out. "
Since the leakage INDUCTANCE wouldn't change the leakage reactance
would be twice as high so the output current wouldn't increase. For the
same reason, the secondary would resonate with only 1/4 the capacitance,
so you couldn't get any more energy out of it than at 60 Hz. I think
those numbers work out but haven't thought them out very well.
Ed