[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:03:55 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:12:59 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <AjmdsD.A.9fB.pNw8CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Antonio's breakout program (INCA) uses 3MV/m as the field
> strength needed at the surface of the object to acquire breakout, I
> believe (at least that's what the field map says).
you don`t need "to believe" - you may set any value you like:
http://cis.ru/~dest/s4.GIF
Yes, I left this option because someone could want to see what would
happen at different pressures, temperatures, other gases, etc.
(And I see that I forgot to give a name to the window frame)
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz