[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:20:41 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 08:29:31 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <j6PS4B.A.mPF.BTN8CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Malcolm.
> >Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Isec (pk) = 61A, with full primary voltage at 38kHz
> > Total tower height - 38' 8"
>
> > 61 a means that bang energy = 241.86 joules - real "big bang", i love
> > this guy %-) total capacitance of discharger and the coil would be 135
> > pf, then secondary voltage is 1.9 MV.
> >
> > Tl> Point is, how much shorter can you make it before it does become a
> > Tl> problem at 1.9MV (I assume that figure is calculated as though the
> > Tl> coil had no losses)?
>
> > if this current peak is just before the discharge (zero voltage), then
> > it`s separated from discharge moment (max voltage) only by a quarter
> > of period of Fres - what losses are you talking about?
> Principally sparkgap losses.
we speak about Isec peak, i.e. energy is already transferred into
secondary - gap losses are already in the past. the coil is very tall, so
coupling probably is very low (b.t.w. - don`t you know how much?), then
losses resistance of gap transformed into secondary would be very high.
> Of course secondary Q is not infinite either. Then there is the ground.
are you tryin to say, that in quarter of period system lose 90 joules - 37%
of its start (at the beginning of the period) energy? and what about
full period then? %)
-----
I am skeptical about space aliens too, but space aliens have a greater
probability of existence in my opinion than extra garage space...
(c) Richard Quick 6-07-95 03:59