[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Teslas Ball Lightning
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Teslas Ball Lightning
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:26:01 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:30:22 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <sVSYd.A.UEC.Fn87CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: boris petkovic <petkovic7@xxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Chris Rutherford"
> <chris1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi All,
>
> On the subject of Tesla claiming things, in Teslas
> paper
> in Telegraph and Telephone Age, Oct. 16, 1927, p.
> 457. Tesla says
> the generator at CS was 1.5MW. "was made in 1899 at
> Colorado
> Springs, where I carried on tests with a generator
> of fifteen hundred
> kilowatt capacity" This figure 1500KW = 1.5MW.
> I've also been
> reading about flywheel energy storage devices (FES),
> it is not
> unreasonable to assume that Tesla was aware of pulse
> kinetic devices,
> so although the RMS was at one value, who knows what
> power levels he
> may have peaked at for example a commercial FES can
> release 11MJ in
> under 30 seconds.
>
> http://www.uptenergy.com/eng/products/pdf/upt-lc.pdf
>
> Where did the figure of 50KW for CS come from?
-----
>From Tesla's CSN directly.
It could have been several kilowatts less or more
than that.
Anycase,the ballpark is there I think.
Actually,in CSN there is his note regarding
preparation for CS transmitter working at ~50 hp
supply capacity (little less than 50 kw).
On the other hand,Westinghause transformer rating was
60 kVA and Tesla put a remark it could have been
loaded ,if necessary and for a short period of
time,2-3 times that value without overheating.
These figures are to be compared with ~10 meter point
to point spark,apparently the longest stricking
distance Tesla achieved by the machine , and
L::SQRT(P) requirements for that.However,an
efficiency may have play its role and it is not sure
if 10 m spark was established by 40,60 or 90 kW input.
One must be aware Tesla sometimes talks in terms of
Megawatt powers consumption of CS coil,but these would
be impulsive RF powers.
Unrealistically high Qs of the coil Tesla used in his
calculations could be another source of various
errors.
Q pumping modes were out of reach for him at the time
anyway.
All the Best,
Boris