[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:28:17 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:30:14 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <fv_XaC.A.LEC.Fn87CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Steve.
Tl> Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tl> I only just got the 48" to break out without a breakout point: on
Tl> some attempts it flashed the secondary before breaking out. So this
Tl> suggests that my 30" tall secondary flashes with about 600kV.
it`s bad news for me - around 1 MV/m...
but it could be not so hopelessly - your secondary arced several times
and it`s still alive :-)
>>you didn`t have a couple bucks for RG-213? :-)))
Tl> It _was_ screened cable- Quadflex mic cable with isolating
Tl> transformers at either end. The screen isn't much help when dealing
Tl> with high voltage strikes with fast rise times.
maybe improper grounding of cable screen, ground loops, no? :-)
-----
I am skeptical about space aliens too, but space aliens have a greater
probability of existence in my opinion than extra garage space...
(c) Richard Quick 6-07-95 03:59