[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TC powered by LV Marx generator?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: TC powered by LV Marx generator?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:52:56 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:53:02 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <SMOKT.A.xJD.tQWaCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Samuel C. Johnson" <metaform@xxxxxxxx>
Does this list have a conversion chart somewhere that I could download?
With all the letter abbreviations, I just delete most of these messages as
they mean nothing to me.
I think I could follow half of the messages if I just knew what "SIDACS" (or
each message uses) meant.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: TC powered by LV Marx generator?
> Original poster: "Peter Terren" <pterren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> For a TC powered by SIDAC's see here
> Peter (Tesla Downunder)
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: TC powered by LV Marx generator?
> >Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Tesla list wrote:
> >>Original poster: "J. Aaron Holmes" <jaholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>...would it be possible to construct a "low-voltage"
> >>Marx generator using SIDACs or MOVs or something
> >>instead of the traditional spark gaps in each stage?
> >>With a dozen or so stages, such a thing might be able
> >>to create a couple of kV from the 120-volt AC line.
> >>Further, if such a thing *did* work, it would just beg
> >>to be connected to a very small SGTC, with the caps in
> >>the Marx doubling as the cap for the TC. Granted,
> >>this would probably not provide for a coil with
> >>continuous output, but it would be interesting
> >This seems perfectly possible. Equivalent to instead of
> >using a single primary capacitor and a multiple spark gap,
> >alternating the capacitors with the gaps.
> >Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz