[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who all has built OLTCs?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Who all has built OLTCs?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:31:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:32:39 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <yEeKcB.A.gtD.GitZCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
I think my DRSSTCs are almost "bullet proof" now. The only thing that
ever causes failure now is primary strikes (the last several have not
damaged anything, though), which i would imagine could also be
destructive on an OLTC. I havent lost any silicon on my DRSSTCs in
quite a long time, and i tend to push things kinda hard ;-). I do
agree that i could see the OLTC being more reliable at the moment, but
i find my coils to be highly reliable as of late with the development
of the over-current detection circuit and the use of primary feedback,
which ensures clean feedback signals under almost any condition.
By the way, i see people blowing up silicon on those OLTCs too! Only
their sparks are shorter! Hahaha!
Steve
On 4/20/05, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: "colin heath" <colin.heath4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> wow Dan! what a statement. the drsstc hasnt stopped blowing up silicone yet
> but many oltc have been built very reliable. i think ok on the performance
> front they come in second but if i had to put one of them into commercial
> use it would be the oltc for its reliabilty.
> cheers
> colin
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:01 PM
> Subject: RE: Who all has built OLTCs?
>
>
> >Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >OLTC means "Obsolete at Last, Tesla Coil"
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
> > >OK, I will ask the silly question. What does
> > >the "OL" mean? (You need to realize there are a lot of us who
> > >are relatively new to this
> > >list.)
> > >Sam Johnson
> >
> >
>
>