[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DRSSTC Magnifier Mark 1
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: DRSSTC Magnifier Mark 1
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:47:27 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:48:41 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <oCGf4.A.Il.d_UYCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
The feedback is still primary feedback, thats the only way i could see
it working and being stable. I remember trying simulations of using
feedback on the ground of the secondary coil but it wouldnt lock to
the right frequency... though this was awhile ago and ive learned so
many things that the sim might have been "flawed".
Is my website not working for people? Still works here, if not a bit
slow. Maybe i need to go complain to my host :-).
On 4/16/05, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: "colin heath" <colin.heath4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> doh! i was talking about this on the tcbouk list a couple of months
> back but as usual talking about it is as far as i got.
> congrats on getting it working. what feedback did you use?
> im interested wether base current feedback would work as all the current
> has to flow through here right?
> although im sure if i remember correct (as website down)
> you use primary current feedback correct?
> well done on yet another breakthrough
> colin heath