[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: marx chokes
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: marx chokes
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:34:55 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:40:49 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <5v56JC.A.7w.xYIXCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 12 Apr 2005, at 17:18, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> "Malcolm:
>
> What was the value of your chokes? I would like to try this idea as
> well. Digi-Key stocks a large number of iron core chokes.
>
> Dr. Resonance"
>
> I doubt that any of those little chokes would take the voltage, and
> would probably saturate at some time during discharge as well. I
> wonder about the large ferrite cored ones as well.
>
> Ed
Did I mention the "rods" were ferrite? I think I may have forgotten.
I'll collect some more concrete info to post tomorrow. The chokes
could usefully have had a lot higher inductance than they did. They
shouldn't saturate as they have end - end airgaps.
Malcolm
>
>