[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIGGG COIL'S NEW PROBLEM
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: BIGGG COIL'S NEW PROBLEM
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:41:47 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:42:30 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <hX3z1D.A.tjD.00WZCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: bigggcoil@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:38:50 -0600
Subject: Re: BIGGG COIL'S NEW PROBLEM
THANKS ALL FOR THE INPUT ON FILTERING. MY BIGGEST CONCERN WAS THIS DID
NOT HAPPEN LAST YEAR, BUT I'LL INSTALL MORE FILTERING AND LOW VALUE
CAPACITORS AT THE SERVICE ENTRANCE TO OUR HOUSE.
COILING IN OKLAHOMA
KEVIN E
One thing to consider is the possibility of high frequency noise riding
back to the mains on the line powering your spark gap. In my experience,
the huge inductance of the distribution transformers eats up most of the
noise trying to return on the hv lines, but often times the gap line is
ingnored. Even if you avoid any direct hits of tank rf to the gap assembly,
just its proximity to the e-field can pump high frequency back into the
supply. I use an LC combo on both lines that power the gap.. thought about
adding some MOVs, but it hasn't been an issue.
Perhaps you're already filtering that... just a thought.
~syd klinge