[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Trial and error
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Trial and error
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:21:55 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:25:19 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <K-n4JB.A.ev.rlIUCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 3 Apr 2005, at 12:31, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Steven Steele" <sbsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Have any of you guys ever just built a good TC by trial and error? Or
> do ya'll always do quantom physics calculations first? LOL.
> Steven Steele
My best coil was designed on the back of an envelope (literally!)
over a cup of tea during a 20 minute tea break. I resonated at
exactly the frequency it was designed to do so and, most crushing of
all for the relativistic afficionados, was designed using simple
lumped parameters. I did make room for consideration of losses due to
skin/proximity effects but a decision to spacewind with a 1:1
wire/space ratio plus a suitable wiresize for its (lowest) frequency
of operation based on a simple guideline kept the quantum genie
firmly corked up in its bottle.
Malcolm