[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <40526810.7852-at-pacbell-dot-net>
References: <6.0.0.22.2.20040312163922.02483a90-at-twfpowerelectronics-dot-com><40526810.7852-at-pacbell-dot-net>
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:19:55 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <OnP7-D.A.tvH.X3nUAB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-twfpowerelectronics-dot-com>

Tungsten is also not attracted to magnets ;-))

Cheers,

         Terry


At 06:46 PM 3/12/2004, you wrote:
>Tungsten is very hard.  If you had access to a hardness gauge you could
>check it and compare with tables of metal hardness.  I suspect that if
>it's hard to scratch with a needle that it is tungsten.
>
>Ed

References:
- Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)
  - From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>

Prev by Date: Re: Magnetic quenching.
Next by Date: Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)
Prev by thread: Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)
Next by thread: Re: Quenched gap (Re: Fritz vs TCBOR -- initial results in...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread