[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SSTC theory
Original poster: Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs-dot-com
I find very interesting this new (at least to me) starting point to
design a TC. If I get it right, you design a Butterworth bandpass filter
with given center frequency and end up with a setup where L1*C1=L2*C2.
But isn't it true that the voltage vs. frequency diagrams is the usual
one? I mean two peaks, more or less separated depending on the coupling
coefficient (if I recall)?
I am just wondering, isn't it so that if one wants to drive a
traditional TC with an SSTC driver (remove the RSG, use an IGBT/FET
bridge), the correct drive frequency is simply
f=1/(2*PI)*SQRT(1/(L1*C1)), supposing that L1*C1=L2*C2?
Or does the SS drive imply a different design technique?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> Sent: 22. kesäkuuta 2004 17:30
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: SSTC theory
> Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq-at-uol-dot-com.br>
> Tesla list wrote:
> >Original poster: Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs-dot-com
> >I can't get your link to work.>
> > Original poster: "Bob Jones" <alwynj-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> > Your link does not work for me, is there something wrong
> with it or the
> > site?
> It was down in the weekend. It's working now. I have added some
> and pictures showing the frequency and time responses of the trial
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz