[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: Re: SSTC does 10 foot sparks*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:42:44 -0600*Resent-Date*: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:46:49 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <NJewOC.A.ZhC.Sud1AB-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "John Couture" <johncouture-at-bellsouth-dot-net> Gerry - I agree you cannot "get more average power out than what is coming in". However, it is very possible to get much more pulse power out than average power in. With Steve's TC it appears that the average power in is about 4800 watts and the pulse power out is about 300 KW giving a power gain of 62.5 . Refer to my reply to Jim. With a potential power output of 300 KW it is obvious that a very long spark would be possible depending on the TC design. That is why using power instead of energy units is not good for rating Tesla coils. It can exagerate the output possibilities of a coil so you have to be very specific about the input conditions.. If you use energy units you will not have this type of problem. The energy output units will always be less than the input units. "Peak power out will be larger than peak power in" is another example of the confusion caused by using power with Tesla coils. "Peak power out" cannot be larger than "peak power in" unless there is a time difference between the two stated powers. This means bringing in time into the process which gets you into an energy process. It would be preferable to say that "Peak power out will be larger than average power in". This still requires more explanation. The time period involved in the output vs the time period involved in the input. And we are back again into energy out vs energy in. Note that when using average power that you are adding time to the power units which brings you into the energy unit solution. This has caused great confusion for coilers in the past. Average power is actually energy because you have to use time to find the average power. In other words when you connect a wattmeter to the input of a TC you are measuring many parameters depending on how you want to use them. For example the wattmeter gives you at the TC input 1. wattage 2. average wattage 3. peak wattage 4. instantaneous wattage 5. volt amps 6. RMS wattage ?? Correctly using all of these parameters can be very confusing. You can avoid all of the above confusion by properly using energy units to rate Tesla coils. If the wattmeter is used as an energy meter you have to do some calcs and you end up with different numbers compared to using it as a power meter. For example a 100 watt wattmeter will give you 50, 100, 200, etc, watt seconds when used as an energy meter if the times are 1/2, 1, 2, etc, seconds. There is a much more to comparing power vs energy and I find that in some of my past posts I have used the words incorrectly. Coilers are correct when they say that power and energy can muddy the waters. John Couture ------------------------------------------------ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 10:42 PM Subject: Re: SSTC does 10 foot sparks > Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net> > > > Hi John, > > What you say may be true, but it is misleading. You can NOT get more > average power out than what is coming in. If you could, you should get a > patent and become rich. Peak power yes. You store up energy over a large > time and then discharge it in a small time and the peak power out will be > larger than the peak power in. > > Gerry R. > > > > Original poster: "John Couture" <johncouture-at-bellsouth-dot-net> > > > > Steve - > > > > Congratulations on your getting 10 foot output sparks from your SSTC coil > > with 4800 watts input. Do you know that the power output of your Tesla > coil > > can be much greater than the power input? In other words the output power > of > > your > > TC can be much greater than the input of 4800 watts. This means the power > > efficiencies (power output/power input) of your TC can be well over 100 > > percent. It is very difficult if not impossible to determine the true > power > > input or power output for a particular output spark. The ratio of power > > output to power input is mostly an unknown for TC's. To my knowledge no > > coiler has ever properly made these measurements. > > > > This is why it makes more engineering sense to use energy input and > energy > > output in rating TC's. The energy efficiency is then equal to energy > > output/energy input. This efficiency is always less than one or 100 > percent > > and can be measured as I have shown in the past. > > > > As a final comment and to avoid muddying the waters I believe the > statement > > "4800 watts input for a 10 foot spark" is an acceptable wording for rating > > TC's in a free speech country. The pictures of those sparks show that no > > matter what you call them they represent a great achievement in Tesla coil > > progress for SSTC's. > > > > John Couture > > ---------------------------------------

- Prev by Date:
**TVSs for protection in spark gap coils** - Next by Date:
**Self-Resonant Driver Boards (DRSSTC, ISSTC, etc...) Bulk Purchase ? ? ? ? Anyone ? ? ?** - Prev by thread:
**Re: SSTC does 10 foot sparks** - Next by thread:
**Re: SSTC does 10 foot sparks** - Index(es):