[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 5MV, 312kW
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds-at-earthlink-dot-net>
Hi Finn, (and Terry Fritz),
Sounds like the Bertha coil in Oklahoma except, I think, it is powered by
49KVA
Terry, I think you mentioned a worlds record Spark length with a coil in
California. Could you comment on what you know about it?? Power input,
design, length of spark, owner, etc.
Gerry R.
Ft. Collins, CO
> Original poster: Finn Hammer <f-h-at-c.dk>
>
> All,
>
> To arrive at 5MV on the top, the toroid has to be the right shape and size
> to suppress breakout at lesser voltages.
> It _could_ look like this in INCA:
> * 5MVtoroid
>
> Lcenter terminal 20 0 2 1.17 2
> Cedge terminal 20 2 2 0.83 0 180
> Cedge terminal 20 2 2 0.83 0 -180
>
> and would then be :
> Minor diametre: 1.66 metre (65")
> Major diametre: 5.00 metre (196")
> Chip in with 250pF of topload and
> 3125 Joules of energy........
>
> Running the coil below it, at 100BPS, would require 312.5kW
>
> Let`s be bold, without being utterly rediculous, and charge the primary
> capacitor to 50kV, it will then have to be 2.5µF
>
> Pairing this cap up in a tank with a primary coil that has 2 turns,
> starting at 70" diametre, 10" spacing and 15.6µH will make it ring at
25kHz.
>
> All we need is a secondary that is 50" in diametre, 250"long wound at 3
> turns per inch.
>
> Assuming 2nd. notch quench, and a coupling of 0.122, the energy will be
> transferred after 13 cycles/break, or a total of 0.052secs/sec. Ringing at
> 5.2% of the time, there should be ample time to charge the cap btwn.
bangs.
>
> I`ve used INCA, ballpark numbers, and wintesla (Yeah, that`s right: the
> reg`d copy), for this brief design exercise which untill someone points
out
> an order of magnitude error, suggests that a 5MV coil is not at all that
> unrealistic, not being concerned with the aspect of funding.
>
> Cheers, Finn Hammer
>