[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Chokes vs Safety Gaps

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Chokes vs Safety Gaps
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:18:16 -0700
Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:24:44 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <Li-0gD.A.nXH.MLDKAB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: dave pierson <davep-at-quik-dot-com> 

 >I fail to see how a ~1mH choke in series with a ~1kH
    Is it a '1 KH' transformer?
      Is it 1 KH AT FREQ OF INTEREST?
     (hint: stray capacitance of transformer effectively lowers the
    impedance...)
    An expolicit RF choke will have more impedance at freq of interest.

>iron-cored transformer secondary will provide any protection whatsoever.

    cf as above.
    (for starters...)
    best
     dwp

Prev by Date: Re: Using 240VAC on 140VAC Varic
Next by Date: Re: Single-bushing 14.7kV pigs. Thoughts?
Prev by thread: Chokes vs Safety Gaps
Next by thread: Re: Chokes vs Safety Gaps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread