[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terry filter alternates?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Terry filter alternates?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:40:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:41:05 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <N5Yza.A.giG.9qRuBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Harold Weiss" <hweiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gary,
That would explain why my resistors got so hot also. I was running with the
12/120 and a .02uF cap. The filter was 500pF and a 1K 50W wirewound on each
side of the cap.
David E Weiss
> Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <gary.lau@xxxxxx>
>
> Hi Ed:
>
> An R-C filter without the C's just isn't a filter and will do little to
> shunt HF transients. Also, a total of 6K in series with your NST will
> consume a lot of power.
>
> Since you are running a close-to-resonant sized cap with a sync RSG, I
> am concerned that your peak charging voltage may be hazardous. I'm
> repeating my measurements below with my 15/60 NST and various cap sizes,
> and it shows how the bang voltage (BV), increases with decreasing Cp.
> I was afraid to try below .02uF, but it's easy to extrapolate where your
> .015uF might fall. Also, the voltages I recorded were the bang
> voltages, not the peak charging voltages, which were considerably
> higher.
>
> Perhaps your 6K of resistance helped current limit the charging and
> prevent destruction?
>
> Measured at 140VAC in:
> Cp BV W
> .02uF 24.4kV 714W
> .03uF 21.9kV 863W
> .04uF 19.6kV 922W
> .05uF 17.1kV 877W
>
> Regards, Gary
>