[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: without wires?
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
On 24 Jul 2004, at 17:26, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Chris Swinson" <tesla-at-cps-electronics.co.uk>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:52 PM
> Subject: without wires?
>
>
> > Original poster: "steve" <steve_vance-at-cablelynx-dot-com>
> >
> > Hi list,
> > Quick question. I have been coiling about a year and never really
> thought > about this. We all know that Tesla dreamed of using his
> creation to
> transmit
> > electricity to homes without the use of wires. Obviously the first
> > realization of his dream was the creation of the Tesla Coil but how
> was
> the
> > electricity supposed to be received? I know about lighting a gas
> tube, I > have done this myself, but really, This is not a very
> efficient way to
> make
> > light. How was the tc output supposed to be received and converted
> to
> useful
> > power over any reasonable distance?(inverse square law) What am I
> missing? > >
>
> Tesla Intended to use coils high up, such as on a large hill or very
> high above sea level. He found the higher he went the lower the
> voltage needed to break down the air. He found at the right voltage
> and height he could get the air to conduct better than any wire or
> cable. The "surface area" of air is of course many many times that of
> what any wire could be. The receiver needed only to be a long antenna
> simple to "touch" this electrical path and in doing this the reciver
> would pull some current from the transmitter. It is the same as a 1:1
> ratio transformer, but with "a lot" of air as the core. Tesla latter
> moved onto conduction via the earth.
>
> Chris
I'm tempted to question the notion of "better conduction" than copper
wire, especially at sub-auroral heights. Certainly the discharges
have a negative resistance characteristic but that doesn't imply they
lose less power over a given distance. In fact sparks (and glow
discharges) dissipate power quite effectively.
Malcolm