RE: Formless secondaries

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Yurtle Turtle by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <yurtle_t-at-yahoo-dot-com>

OK.

Assuming I were to make an 8" to 10" formless
secondary, how would I support a rather large spun
aluminum topload?

thanks
Adam
--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
 > Original poster: "Mark Snoswell by way of Terry
 > Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <mark-at-cgCharacter-dot-com>
 >
 > The way I have it set up it's very easy to make
 > formless coils and they
 > turn out to be mechanically very strong... So quite
 > apart from any
 > potential operational benefits they look way cool
 > and you can reuse the
 > form and winding setup again and again -- great for
 > making a number of
 > coils for testing parameters. I suspect there will
 > be some minor
 > insulation benefits by being able to coat the
 > interior of the coil with
 > 2 part resin also.
 >
 > ...anyway... I'm having a great time refining the
 > process. Third test
 > coil is mostly done and I've started characterising
 > the first two coils.
 > Photos will come soon as I get a chance.
 >
 > Mark
 >
 >
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 > Dr Mark Snoswell.
 > Creator & Head Dude
 > www.cgCharacter-dot-com
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >  >"davep" <davep-at-quik-dot-com>
 >  >formless secondaries have been discussed
 > previousl, the archives may
 > have some thoughts
 >  >of interest.  My informal recollection of the
 > thoughts is:
 >  >
 >  >	form losses, for 'reasonable forms' are so low as
 >  >	to make the advantages of formless construction
 >  >	questionable...
 >
 > ---
 > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 > Checked by AVG anti-virus system
 > (http://www.grisoft-dot-com).
 > Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release
 > Date: 10/03/2003
 >
 >
 >