[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: First Magnifier construction

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: RE: First Magnifier construction
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 16:08:01 -0700
Resent-Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:45:29 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <FpHBZC.A.DzE.hWNj--at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <daniel.h.mccauley-at-lmco-dot-com>


Building a magnifier is not very critical.  Magnifiers as they are
commonly built, don't offer any real efficiency benefit compared
to normal 2-coil systems.

 >>>>>> I'm not sure anything proof over this has been provided yet whether a
two-coil or magnifier coil is
more efficient than the other.  It is a heavily debated topic though - at
least from what I've read and heard.

The Captain

Prev by Date: RE: Mag amps and generators ?
Next by Date: Re: Tube regulator for removing ripple . . .
Prev by thread: Re: High midnight at the Texas corral
Next by thread: Re: First Magnifier construction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread