[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: panasonic mmc rating?
Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>
Hi Larry,
Nobody does "math" anymore :o)) Just get the computer program:
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/TeslaCoils/Programs/Mmccalc2.zip
============================
MMC Calculator Ver. 2.2 9/12/2000 Terry Fritz
Transformer voltage = 6500
Transformer current = .02
Firing voltage = 9192.365
Fo = 200000
Break rate = 200
Thermal dissipation constant = 70
Individual cap value = 3.3E-08
Strings Caps/Str Capacitance Voltage Temp C Cost I Arms
2 9 7.33 14400 5.17 18.00 :-)) :-) 2.59
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3 13 7.62 20800 2.48 39.00 :-)) :-)) 2.69
4 17 7.76 27200 1.45 68.00 :-)) :-)) 2.74
4 18 7.33 28800 1.29 72.00 :-)) :-)) 2.59
===============================
I "knew" the current handling of the caps already since I have done so much
work with Panasonic caps. But MMCcalc should do everything you need.
There is a little text file that explains it if I remember right. Just a
silly little DOS program but it does the math... It is based of that earth
shattering paper at:
http://hot-streamer-dot-com/TeslaCoils/MMCInfo/MMCPower4.html
Don't take the "life expectancy" stuff too seriously. MMCs seem to last
just fine. I just copied that data from some cap manufacturers. But they
seemed to know less than I did back then ;-))
Cheers,
Terry
At 07:31 PM 9/25/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>Terry response I accidentally deleted.
>essentially it was
>"according to my calculations... the cap draws about 4arms"
>
>so....
>If I wanted to do these calculations...
>I'll just make up some numbers...
>6.5kv 20ma nst.
>charging current 20ma.
>7.5nf cap.
>charge time 1/120 s.
>cant remember the formula (ready for this butcher job?)
>something like charge time * charge current * charge voltage = joules
>charge time is the inverse of frequency.
>
>therefore... if cap charging is 60hz, discharge is say... 200khz.
>perhaps watts * ratio of charge freq by discharge freq
>== assuming a lossless transfer ==
>
>I've been known for creative math (as i call it),
>which some might just call 'plain wrong.'
>
>larry.
>
>