RE: Teslas enjoyment of ozone.

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <daniel.h.mccauley-at-lmco-dot-com>


Hi Dan

Ozone will not build up in the blood, ozone is highly reactive thou and may
destroy lung tissue. As fast as ozone is been produced by the coils sparks
it is been converted back into Oxygen.

Duncan(UK)

Thats not a true statement.  I can run a coil in my basement for five
minutes, and heavy concentrations of ozone will remain there for more than
12 hours.

Dan



----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Teslas enjoyment of ozone.


> Original poster: "Writeme Now by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<writeme42-at-hotmail-dot-com>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I recently read "Man out of Time" by Margaret Cheney.  I seem
> to recall something about Tesla wanting to open up some Ozone
> Parlors and charge admission.  He seemed to like the smell,
> and side effects, yet everywhere i read about the dangers of
> inhallation.  What are the dangers of ozone besides headaches,
> and does it build up in the blood and have long term effects???
>
> Dan
>
>
> >From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Subject: Re: Objections to Steel Wire?
> >Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 11:09:41 -0600
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc3-f1.law16.hotmail-dot-com ([65.54.236.136]) by
> >mc3-s17.law16.hotmail-dot-com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 2
Oct
> >2002 10:19:02 -0700
> >Received: from hotlilpup.pupman-dot-com ([63.225.119.186]) by
> >mc3-f1.law16.hotmail-dot-com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 2
Oct
> >2002 12:18:44 -0700
> >Received: from poodle.pupman-dot-com (IDENT:root-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> >[10.0.0.5])by hotlilpup.pupman-dot-com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id
> >g92HHme17254;Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:17:49 -0600
> >Received: (from slist-at-localhost)by poodle.pupman-dot-com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
> >LAA17365;Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:17:30 -0600
> >Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:17:30 -0600
> >Message-Id: <4.1.20021002110938.00a27678-at-pop.dnvr.qwest-dot-net>
> >X-Sender: twftesla-at-pop.dnvr.qwest-dot-net
> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Resent-Message-ID:
> ><zbePnD.A.ZAC.jlym9-at-poodle>
> >Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >X-Mailing-List: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> archive/latest/3561
> >X-Loop: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Return-Path: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2002 19:18:44.0781 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[8693ADD0:01C26A48]
> >
> >Original poster: "Jason by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> ><jasonp-at-btinternet-dot-com>
> >
> >All,
> >
> > > Intellectual curiosity makes me wonder what the actual impact
> > > to performance would be [with steel wire], if tried...
> >
> >I did a little test about a year ago to compare steel and copper wire. I
> >had
> >already built my primary, so I decided to see what the effects would be
if
> >I
> >used it to wire up my tank circuit. I used 2mm dia. for both tests (small
> >thickness = more obvious results). The copper wire gave me almost a third
> >output again than the steel wire did at the same power! I was running
> >10/110
> >NST farm, Cp 22nF at 200bps with Lp 18uH  - giving somewhere around 55A
> >pri.
> >RMS current. The (bare) steel wire got hot enough to melt the acrylic
> >standoffs that I was using after about 30 seconds, but the copper wire
was
> >only warm after a 5 minute run at 1.1kVA.
> >
> >For the primary, I was using good 'ole microbore, and after the
experiment
> >switched back to much thicker gauge copper wire (about 5mm) to connect up
> >the primary tank circuit, and now get no detectable rise in temperature.
I
> >certainly wouldnt reccomend using steel wire anywhere in the primary of a
> >TC. Im not sure what the magnetic effects on the system were (i.e.
residual
> >magnetism in the steel wire) but I do know that the resistive losses were
> >very high.
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >
> >Jason
> >[UK Geek #1139 Rank G-2]
> >[HV / Tesla / Laser / Comp]
> >[  www.thegeekgroup-dot-org   ]
>
>
>
>
>