[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: RE: Variable Capacitance and Inductance*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Sat, 25 May 2002 19:29:47 -0600*Resent-Date*: Sat, 25 May 2002 19:29:57 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <xDLFTD.A.e0B.SqD88-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "David Thomson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dave-at-volantis-dot-org> Hi Terry, >"Modern" equtions and methods account for the errors in that often cited formula. Trying to use it today is of no value other than teaching student how to apply Maxwell's equation to a coil. It is really a bad example, but a good example would be too complex for the purpose. That old formala has nothing to do with the definition of inductance but it is just a poor example of how to use the difinitions. I wasn't meaning to say that inductance is defined as a coil. I was trying to say that the inductance of a coil is defined by its physical parameters times the permeability constant, just like the capacitance of a capacitor is defined as its physical parameters times the permittivity constant. It is reasonable that if the inductance of a coil is not defined as the physical parameters times the permeability constant that it wouldn't be taught in the classroom. >But the modern equations work perfectly fine without the Earth's effects. The modern Wheeler's equations already account for the earth's effects. What I'm doing now, as a result of this discussion, is searching NASA files for any information about air core coils in space. If I don't find anything this weekend, I'll write NASA and ask for information. If I'm right about Wheeler's formula already taking the earth effect into account, then an air core coil in space will have a slightly higher inductance reading. If I'm wrong, it won't. >So Tesla's tests could have a lot of interfeerence error :-( Atmospheric electrity, AC hum, sun spots... That stuff is not the raised sphere's problem. Capacitance is not entirely a property of the sphere. That's why the formulas for capacitor capacitance and coil inductance have constants attached to them that account for the effects of free space. So it is the raised sphere's problem because it's effective capacitance in the circuit must deal with the effects of "interference" as you call it. The "interference" or added dielectric strength has to be dealt with by the oscillating system. It can't be ignored. >It would have to be reproduced today with trusted equipment where the details are known or could be determined. Then the results could be beleived and trusted. Exactly. That's all I'm saying too. We need to duplicate Tesla's work before we can conclusively say he was right or wrong. >I see Paul just delivered a good knockout punch =:o< I didn't think so. He misrepresented my position to the point that he was attacking something I didn't say or believe. I would call it shadow boxing :-). >What would be needed is a clear table for values of the 30 inch sphear's elevation vs. capacitance with the wire there. Like this: I'll get to this later. I've got to leave for a bit. Dave

- Prev by Date:
**RE: Variable Capacitance and Inductance** - Next by Date:
**RE: Variable Capacitance and Inductance** - Prev by thread:
**RE: Variable Capacitance and Inductance** - Next by thread:
**Re: Variable Capacitance and Inductance** - Index(es):