[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternate Tesla Coils (Re: Pulse Transformer)
Original poster: "rob by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rob-at-pythonemproject-dot-com>
Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "davep by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> >>>I have never heard of a vacuum tube Tesla coil. Are you perhaps
> >>>referring to Wardencliff where the plan was to create an
> >>>open ended vacuum?
> >> Roughly speaking a VTTC uses a vacuum tube to replace the
> >>spark gap. The tube is put into conduction long enough to
> >>"ring up" the secondary, then cut off. The envelope is
> >>approximately flat instead of exponential as in a SG coil
> >>hence the "CW as opposed to impulse" explanation. That's
> >>kinda raw; use Google to find more.
> > Most interesting, I have read about another replacement
> >for the spark gap. I will read about vacuum tubes.
> There are a couple of different concepts:
> Direct Replacement (which the usual VTTC does not
> do, tho it could be done .... I guess) to have a
> 'shock excited' system, analogous to a spark gap
> coil. 'functional' is more common, where the VT
> is used in a conventional oscillator, which
> provides continuous wave (CW) excitation of the
> Tesla Secondary.
I have a sort of vacuum tube tesla coil via ham equipment. It is a 3ft
high coil wound with 1/4" pipe and resonates at 1.8mhz. I can drive it
with a 3kW linear amplifier and get a nice purple flame off of the top.
If you AM modulate the RF, you can talk into the mike and the flame
talks back to you :) Rob.
The Numeric Python EM Project