[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pulse Transformer
Original poster: "davep by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <davep-at-quik-dot-com>
> Just reading all the things said in this series of posts makes me
> wonder whether anyone, apart from myself, has trouble agreeing with a
> lot of the concepts expressed here? ?
> For example, since when has a TC been a wideband transformer?
Since the usual TC has no core.
Frequency response is limited, in large measure, by the
core and associated inductance. removal of the core
makes a TC broadband. Also, details of winding.
The usual TC is not PLANNED to be broadband, and has
a particular frequency or frequencies where performance
will be optimal. However, if compared, in an engineering
sense, to a broadband transformer (RF or pulse), the
similarliries are obvious.
There was a recent concern fo r'basic research' on TC.
I suggest that much relavant research exists, in related
fields, and could be usefully, if not casually, applied
to TC work.
> Since a when did a disruptive TC not ring up with some sinusoidal
> waveform while its primary rang down?
So will a opulse transfromer or broadband transformer.