# Rewrite of Mutual Inductance Laws for Tesla List

```Original poster: "harvey norris by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>

The laws of Mutual Inductance for air core coils only
implies a several percentage points effeiciency;
TRANSLATION; 100 REACTIVE WATTS IN- 5 WATTS REACTIVE
WATTS OUT

However those laws only specify L1L2 in air core, and
with increased frequency of input for L1L2 coils if we
give each of these L quantities an associated C1 and
C2 values, we should expect the mutual induction to
increase, or more properly the ability of the L1C1
primary to excite the L2C2 secondary for comparisons
here.
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/RI/Dsc00184.jpg
L1 =10.8 mh, C1 =14 uf
L2= 60 henry, C2= 1 nf

Input = 1.67 volts *.35 A = .58 VAR
Output=(4/3.16*1000)*.004A = 5.06 VAR

Since the volt-ampereres measurements only indicate
possible deviations from actual real power input, when
it it is shown that the components are actually
matched to be as completely resonant as possible, the
reactive power arguments completely fail to show how
the the output coils appear to be greater than the
input.

The simple statement of the fact is that the
unenergized field of this 7 pole face rotor -at- 480 hz
can produce only 1.67 volts enabling .35 A on the 14
gauge coil in DSR1 resonance, but >1250 volts to light
a one ended neon leakage current across the 1 nf
capacity occurs on the secondary side. When the field
is actually energized the output side does get reduced
according to the increased neon leakage current.

15 Volt Operation
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/RI/Dsc00178.jpg

In that operation there having over 6000 volts across
the caps,experimentation suggests that all three
voltage lines of conduction making that high voltage
can be cut from its supply source, and instead THE
SAME LEVEL OF VOLTAGE BY DSR1 INDUCTION ALONE WILL
APPEAR!

Pray tell us what is the K mutual inductance factor
here in this coefficient by calculations here? The
ordinary L1L2 mutual inducatnce equations do not
account for the increased efficiency afforded by
giving each L quantity a C to resonate with the
imposed frequency.

Indeed here is an alternator with no energized field
exercizing resonance of L1C1 through space to L2C2 and
producing one ended neon discharge! So to complain at
least to science law makers of presumptions it can be
said that air core mutual inductance laws do not
preclude a non performance factor. HDN

=====
Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/

```