[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: magnetically quenched gaps
Original poster: "Matthew Smith by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <matt-at-kbc-dot-net.au>
--8x-----snip---
> Electronics. The old magnetron magnets were indeed almost 100 mm
> diameter, but the newer ones are much smaller.
--8x-----snip---
Does the physical size of the magnet actual come into this?
My mental picture had a string of MO magnets and two pieces
of bent iron (poles). This way, you could use as many
magnets as necessary - the iron or other suitably low
reluctance material bringing the flux back to the desired
point, no matter how long (or tall) the stack.
IIIIIIII * IIIIIIII
II II
II II
IIMMMMMMMMMMMMM...MII
IIAAAAAAAAAAAAA...AII
IIGGGGGGGGGGGGG...GII
II123456789ABCD...nII
An alternative would be an iron base with a stack either side with pole
pieces coming from the tops.
IIIIIIII * IIIIIIII
MAG1 MAG4
MAG2 MAG5
MaG3 MAG6
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
* is the spark gap. Image viewed looking down the length of one of the
electrodes.
Cheers
M
--
Matthew Smith | _ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
IT Consultant | ( ) - No HTML/RTF in e-mail
Kadina, South Australia | X - No Microsoft docs in e-mail
http://www.kbc-dot-net.au | / \ - No vCards