[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: RE: New Inductance Formula*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:35:05 -0600*Resent-Date*: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:42:05 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <6JuK9C.A.AxC.X3r08-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "David Thomson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dave-at-volantis-dot-org> Hi Antonio, >The inductance of a long solenoid is given, theoretically, by: eq1 >L=u0*a*N^2/l H Where did you find this formula? It is interesting in that it uses metric units and gives inductance as henry. The values are not very accurate, but it can be modified to give better results. eq2 >L=4*pi^2*2.54/100*r^2*N^2/(10*l+9*r) uH It is better to use eq1. Both formulas have similar (but inaccurate) values but eq1 produces the correct units. Also, if you take eq1 and add radius to the denominator: u0*2*pi*R^2*N^2 eq3 henry = --------------- R+L you get a much more accurate formula for metric that also has the correct units. This is comparable to the formula: (N*R)^2*4*10^-6*kg*m eq4 henry = -------------------- (R + H)coul^2 Where eq4 is just a little closer to Wheeler than eq3. Dave

- Prev by Date:
**Safety Gap scare** - Next by Date:
**RE: Malfunctioning MOT** - Prev by thread:
**Re: New Inductance Formula** - Next by thread:
**RE: New Inductance Formula** - Index(es):