[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SSTC As a transmitter.
Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>
> And I wrote:
> > And what is meant by a 'slow-wave' resonator? Does the adjective
> > mean anything?
>
> Jim wrote:
> > Some structure along which a wave propagates at less than free
> > space.
>
> For EM waves, that applies to all physical structures. Can you
> make a fast-wave helical resonator? Hence my feeling that the
> term is redundant, although it sounds impressive.
Perhaps I should have used the term "significantly slower" than free space.
Indeed, ordinary coax (or a bare wire) has a propagation velocity a
fraction that of free space. The slow wave structure in a TWT, for
example, though, propagates the wave at around 53E6 m/sec (0.17c)
>
> Jim wrote:
> > Corums used the terminology when describing their (now
> > deprecated) theories of TC function (basically a 1/4 wave
> > transmission line much shorter than free space 1/4 wave because
> > propagation is in a "slow wave structure")..
>
> I disagree, that's about the only bit they got right in their
> 'Class Notes' paper. The rest is worthless or wrong.
It was the theories I was deprecating, not the use of the term to describe
the TC secondary..
> --
> Paul Nicholson
> --