Re: High Power Solid State Tesla Coil - Successful Test

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "D.C. Cox by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>


Ed:

Wasn't this "patent" thing also shared by two British experimenters named
Oliver and Lodge?

Regards,

D.C. Cox



----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: High Power Solid State Tesla Coil - Successful Test


> Original poster: "Ed Phillips by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
>
> Tesla list wrote:
> >
>
> > > Right now I'm keeping a low profile for my Tesla stuff on my web page,
> > > since its supposed to be in the June issue of IEEE Antennas and
> > > Propagation Magazine.
>
> What's in the article?  I don't get A&P, but can probably find someone
> at work who does.
>
> > They will be suprised to see Tesla stuff in
> > > there.  But then Tesla did invent radio, according to the Supreme
Court
>
> That is NOT what the Supreme Court ruled, although that's often
> stated.  What they did rule was that, with the exception of a Marconi
> "two-tuned-circuit" patent Tesla and others anticipated almost all of
> the Marconi patents which Marconi claimed the government had infringed,
> and that therefore no damages had been done.  I have the complete
> transcripts of both findings in the den, and have been working my way
> through them for several months trying to figure out for myself just
> what the ruling covered.  A separate opinion by at least one of the
> Justices stated specifically that they weren't ruling on who was "the
> inventor of radio" and stating that in his opinion there wasn't any one
> inventor.
>
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Rob.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>