Re: High Power Solid State Tesla Coil - Successful Test

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net>

Congrats on your success. It is quite amazing to see all the work you've
put into this. Many
man hours I imagine.
When the June issue comes out, be so kind to post it for us.

Also, I agree with Ed Phillips on the radio comment. My conclusion to case
369 was that Marconi
"did not" invent "the radio", nor did Tesla, nor did Dodge, etc.. but it
was the comprised
technology of the inventors metioned in the case (and their predessors) who
invented the
various technology's which could be used for wireless communication.
Marconi did use these
technology's to send the letter 's' across the Atlantic and should be
credited according to his
deeds. The inventors of the technology's which Marconi used should also be
credited according
to their deeds (that's where Marconi really screwed up). I think the case
did set the score
right. It is a mind boggling case to read.

Take care,
Bart

Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Ed Phillips by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
>
> Tesla list wrote:
> >
>
> > > Right now I'm keeping a low profile for my Tesla stuff on my web page,
> > > since its supposed to be in the June issue of IEEE Antennas and
> > > Propagation Magazine.
>
>         What's in the article?  I don't get A&P, but can probably find
someone
> at work who does.
>
> > They will be suprised to see Tesla stuff in
> > > there.  But then Tesla did invent radio, according to the Supreme Court
>
>         That is NOT what the Supreme Court ruled, although that's often
> stated.  What they did rule was that, with the exception of a Marconi
> "two-tuned-circuit" patent Tesla and others anticipated almost all of
> the Marconi patents which Marconi claimed the government had infringed,
> and that therefore no damages had been done.  I have the complete
> transcripts of both findings in the den, and have been working my way
> through them for several months trying to figure out for myself just
> what the ruling covered.  A separate opinion by at least one of the
> Justices stated specifically that they weren't ruling on who was "the
> inventor of radio" and stating that in his opinion there wasn't any one
> inventor.
>
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Rob.
>
> Ed