Re: RSG Idea

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>

I note that Fruengel quotes the Rad Lab documents as saying this form of
rotary gap didn't work very well.. the dielectric tended to burn up, and
given that you still have to spin a disk and time it properly, you might as
well spin electrodes.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: RSG Idea


> Original poster: "Matthew Smith by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <matt-at-kbc-dot-net.au>
>
> Hi Cory, All
>
> If this basic idea isn't flawed, I can think of ways of taking it
> further; insulating disc with round holes (more mechanical strength than
> slots)...
> >
> Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Original poster: "Cory Roussel by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <imcuddlycory-at-yahoo-dot-com>
> ---8x------
>
>
> why not have a gap of 2
> > electrodes set 5 mm apart with a rotating Plexiglass
> > disk,
>
> ---8x------
> >
> > Cory Roussel
> > Rank G1 Geek# 1206
>
>
>
>