[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Full Bridge IR 2153 Configuration
Original poster: "K. C. Herrick by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <kchdlh-at-juno-dot-com>
David (& all)-
I had 8, IR2110s arrayed on p.c. boards surrounding the low end of the
12" x 35" secondary--about 3" below the lower end of the secondary. The
2110s were just "out in the air", not shielded. I had tried lots of
bypassing, here & there, with no improvement. Things greatly improved
when I got rid of the 2110s and substituted the bipolar-transistor
circuits.
But I don't know for sure whether it was purely due to the secondary's
e.m.f. or perhaps due instead, or in part, to some spurious oscillations
that I may have been suffering from during the course of my perfecting
(if I may use that word in this context) my design. I did not keep any
records and even if I had tried to do so, it likely wouldn't have meant
much since I was never sure as to where exactly the problem was coming
from.
Maybe those improvements you cite will do the trick, but I'd think you
might want to hay-wire one or more of the ICs first just to make (almost)
sure.
Regards,
Ken Herrick
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 21:15:17 -0700 "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
writes:
> Original poster: "David Sharpe by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <sccr4us-at-erols-dot-com>
>
> Hi Ken,
> Several questions:
>
> 1. How close was driver to TC resonator?
> 2. Was the driver in a metallic enclosure or "open air"?
> 3. Appropriate bypassing / MOV protection on "DC rails"?
>
> This chip is designed for fluorescent lamp ballasts, which aren't
> exactly quiet (EMI/RFI wise), especially when striking/starting
> lamps. The chips I'm looking to use (IR2153D, IR21531D)
> are only 2-3 years old, and have "ESD and EMI/RFI hardening
> improvements" over original IR2155 (paraphrasing IR's press
> release). So must have been field experiences like you
> mentioned to require a redesign (read "new and improved")
> chip. Not doubting there may be diffculties / sensitivities with
> this and thanks for feedback.
>
> Regards
> Dave Sharpe, TCBOR
> Chesterfield, VA. USA
>
> Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Original poster: "K. C. Herrick by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <kchdlh-at-juno-dot-com>
> >
> > A word of caution regarding the high/low-side IR drivers: I had
> tried to
> > use that type of IR IC early-on, in my s.s. coil, and seem to
> have found
> > that the high e.m. field of the secondary interfered with the
> driver's
> > internal high-impedance high-side coupler circuit--to the extent
> that I
> > had to abandon the effort and go to a home-made
> bipolar-transistor
> > h-bridge driver + gate-transformers. Those interested in those
> ICs might
> > want to make sure they will withstand the ambient field before
> committing
> > to pc boards...
> >
> > Ken Herrick
> >
> > On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:31:22 -0700 "Tesla list"
> <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> > writes:
> > > Original poster: "David Sharpe by way of Terry Fritz
> > > <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <sccr4us-at-erols-dot-com>
> > >
> > > IR supplied info today for full bridge driver using two (2)
> > > IR2153's
> > > A series resistor is wired from Rt terminal of first (master)
> chip
> > > and
> > >
> > > wired to Ct of second (slave) chip. A pull up resistor is
> > > installed
> > > between Ct of Vcc of second chip to allow minimum voltage
> > > on Ct to agree with following relationship:
> > >
> > > 1/6Vcc (shutdown) < Ct <= 1/3Vcc
> > >
> > > According to Applications Engineering, both chips will now be
> > > running
> > > in anti-phase relationship to one another (i.e. a full bridge
> > > driver).
> > >
> > > When I build PCB will design board to support master or slave
> > > configuration (maybe setup via a dip switch or optocoupled
> > > [isolated] mode).
> > >
> > > To support a same phase configuration (as self balancing
> multilevel
> > > converter), an inverter must be used between Rt of master and
> Ct
> > > of slave chip; a high speed optocoupler will nicely perform
> this
> > > isolated
> > > signal inversion function, and allow galvanic isolation
> between
> > > stages.
> > >
> > > Now its time to start laying out and assembling some PCB's...
> > > Still consider a full bridge converter capable of ~2kW for
> silicon
> > > cost of < $20. Incredible... :^D
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Dave Sharpe, TCBOR
> > > Chesterfield, VA. USA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>