Re: magnifier vs two coil system

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Gary Hill by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <garyhill2-at-earthlink-dot-net>

Brad

I don't think you have missed anything that everyone else didn't miss also.
If you throw a bunch of parts together into a "car" configuration, you may
end with something that looks  like a car. However if you don't understand
how a car works and what it is for it is very unlikely that  you can make a
working car even if you have all the right parts. Some here have made tesla
coils in a magnifier configuation. I don't have any reason to believe that
any of those coils actually magnified anything.

I remember reading a paper written by Tesla somewhere  on the net. ( lost
the URL ) In this paper Tesla talked about a convention or something  that
he had been at demonstrating  how it was possible to run  many different
appliances with only one wire. ( No return wire )
He then wrote that learning about  powering things with one wire led to
wireless transmition and wireless led to the magnifier.

Does anyone here understand  how to power something  with one wire?  I don't
think so. This kind of knowledge is shunned. Any one with any real education
will tell you that it is imposable. Why is it imposable? Because it doesn't
fit into the rules set forth by a few men a hundred and some years ago. Did
these men that wrote the rules about how electrons react really know
everything that can be known about electrons?

Tesla was quietly shunned when it was learned that what he was trying to do
at Warrencliff would eventually provide free or nearly free energy for
almost anyone  in the world.

Some say that Warrencliff wouldn't work. I disagree. If it wasn't workable
and provable  they would have simply let Tesla make a fool of himself. The
fact that Tesla was suddenly a nobody  in spite of his success and fame says
it all to me.

I am not here because I want to make big sparks. I believe that Tesla was
the master  of  electrical resonance. I have no formal training in
electronics.  I thought this might be the place to learn about  resonant
circuits.

I have seen articles on a couple of websites that talk of a Packard that
Tesla had. It was powered by "collected" energy, one article said is would
run up to 90 MPH.

I believe that Tesla powered the  Packard  using some kind of resonant
circuit and probably his one wire power transfer technology.

here is a URL that is related to one wire power transfer
http://www.cheniere-dot-org/techpapers/Final%20Secret%20of%2015%20Feb%201994/ind
ex.html

Gary H

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: magnifier vs two coil system


> Original poster: "Brad Huff by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<huffb-at-avalon-dot-net>
>
> After reading some of Richard Hull's notes from 1995-1996, on his
magnifier
> experiments I have been given to believe that this was the only way to
proceed
> for large coil designs. However I see very little posted on this subject
> lately, and it seems people are still leaning to the two coil design. I
haven't
> looked through the archives but I'm wondering if the magnifier wasn't as
> promising as origionaly thought or "What have I missed"?-Brad.
>
>
>