[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Herrick's... SSTC
Original poster: "Kennan C Herrick by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <kcha1-at-juno-dot-com>
[responses from KCH interspersed]
On Fri, 18 May 2001 15:53:19 -0600 "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Original poster: "Peter Lawrence by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <Peter.Lawrence-at-Sun-dot-com>
> am I correct in assuming that since your SSTC is synchronized
> to the secondary (ie there is no primary res frequency to adjust)
> that it
> will drive just about any secondary coil within reason.
Yes. But "within reason" must take into account rise/fall times of the
primary excitation: At 140 KHz, each half cycle occupies ~3.5 us. Within
that time period, one has to turn off & on all the MOSFETs, bucking the
Miller effect and suffering the dissipation during the turning-off times.
Already, that's not much time so I'd think that ~200 KHz might be the
> What would be the practical upper frequency limit of your SSTC,
> could I use it
> to drive my 3.5" x 12" mini TCs (I've wound them with everything
> from #24
> to #36 wire, Fres anywhere from 650kHz to 150kHz (those are approx,
> I'm trying
> to remember this stuff off the top of my head, notes are at home))?
> Will it be possible to design a digital control that gives a
> number of primary oscilations, and then shuts off until restarted
> (by manual
> button, or by preset time delay)?
Oh, yes. Currently I use a single CD4024 ripple counter to sequence the
interrupted mode. One could easily add another one for a larger range, a
selector switch, and a stopping-circuit so as to do that. Or perhaps
substitute either a decade-output counter or add a binary:decimal
converter, to get finer control.
> Could IGBTs (what Terry is using) be used for more voltage in the
> I'm wondering about using 1600v MOT power verses 160v to compare the
> of more verses fewer oscilations to breakout (ie build one machine
> that could
> be run either way)?
My sense has been that IGBTs are slower turning on & off than MOSFETs but
maybe they've improved. As to higher voltage, sure...but the transistors
must at the same time accomodate the higher current, of course. As it
is, every 6 pairs of my MOSFETs handle all the primary current; they get
only moderately warm over perhaps 8-10 seconds of continuous running -at-
near-max. I-line. That's only a rough statement since I've not done any
measuring; but I could probably do with 4 pairs, comfortably, instead of
the 6--absent any additional cooling, that is.
> My order for plans is in!
> Peter Lawrence.
I'll post a notice when I've finalized my offer. Thanks for your
interest--and that of the others who will read this!
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: