[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: Re: Sphere/Toroid Comparison Chart*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Thu, 10 May 2001 05:50:39 -0600*Resent-Date*: Thu, 10 May 2001 06:12:31 -0600*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <3MxrRB.A.rSH.sWo-6-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net> The charge distribution should be independent of voltage (excepting effects like space charge or corona). They are all linear equations so superposition should hold. Where it all breaks down (pun intended, or not), is when the field gets high enough to ionize (break down) the air, and that is, most definitely, a nonlinear process. The electrostatic equations are actually quite simple. It's the analytic solutions for an arbitrary geometry that are complex (cf. analytic expression for E-field between two spheres). The whole beauty of Finite Element Methods (FEM) is that if you break your problem up into sufficiently small parts, you can essentially do numerical integration and get an approximate answer that is so close to the real thing that it's not worth arguing about. The nifty thing these days, with piles of CPU, is that you can run the numerical integration multiple times, get a whole raft of data points, and then come up with a relatively simple empirically derived equation. Back in the 20's, Medhurst, et al, had to build a pile of capacitors, measure them with excruciating precision, etc. Now, you can build those caps (or inductors) on a computer, FEM them once, and be done with it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: Re: Sphere/Toroid Comparison Chart > Original poster: "Luc by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <ludev-at-videotron.ca> > > Hi Matt, Kurt, all > > Tx guy, both of your answer are logical, I know that > electrostatic equations are not particularly easy .... To have a > final word on that we probably need measurement and if Matt > theory is good; measurement at high voltage ( not sure about that > but I think the repulsive force could be higher at higher voltage > pushing the charge farther on the exterior ???). > > Cheers, > > Luc Benard > > P.S. I need to try to understand the electrostatic equations ;-) > > Tesla list wrote:

- Prev by Date:
**Re: far fetched idea...** - Next by Date:
**Re: Sphere/Toroid Comparison Chart** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Sphere/Toroid Comparison Chart** - Next by thread:
**Re: Sphere/Toroid Comparison Chart** - Index(es):